THE FORGE RANKINGS·2026-08-30

Claude 4 Opus

Anthropic
33
RANK of 37 ranked
FERROX INDEX30.0 weighted mean of category positions
GRADEE bottom of the measured field
EVIDENCE10 / 32 benchmarks measured
QUALITYFULL every category rests on independent benchmarks

No measurement in Preference. That weight was redistributed, which is the same as assuming this model would have scored its own average there. It is an assumption, not a measurement.

Compared to what

Each rail is one classification. Every ranked model measured on it is a tick; this model is the orange marker. A hatched rail means this model has no measurement in that classification and its weight was redistributed.

Agents

10of 37 measured
46.6
13.1median 38.963.0

Coding

1of 37 measured
70.7
22.4median 50.070.7

Reasoning

36of 37 measured
27.3
18.1median 62.893.0

Preference

no qualifying measurement
53.1median 71.882.5

Every measurement, and the field behind it

One card per benchmark this model has been measured on. The rail shows where it sits against every other ranked model measured on the same benchmark. Where the evaluator keys on a harness, the harness is named, because the same model scores differently under a different one.

SWE-bench Verified (Epoch's own run)

17/21
70.7% best 83.5% · Claude Opus 4.7
Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0

LMArena Text (style-controlled)

17/20
1414 best 1507 · Claude Fable 5
LMArena CC-BY-4.0

Cybench

3/5
38.0% best 55.0% · Claude Sonnet 4.5
Cybench leaderboard CC-BY-4.0

Not measured

22/32
  • ALE-Bench
  • APEX Agents
  • LMArena Agent
  • DeepSWE
  • FrontierCode
  • Terminal-Bench 2
  • LMArena WebDev
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0
  • OSWorld
  • BrowseComp
  • IMOAnswerBench
  • SWE-bench Multilingual
  • AIME
  • CyberGym
  • HMMT
  • MCP-Atlas
  • SWE-bench Pro
  • Tau2-Bench Airline
  • Tau2-Bench Banking
  • Tau2-Bench Retail
  • Tau2-Bench Telecom
  • Tool-Decathlon
A missing benchmark is not a zero and is never scored as one.

Check it yourself

Every number on this page, with who measured it, the interval they published, the harness it was run under, and where to go and read it. Nothing here was measured by Ferrox Labs.

BenchmarkClassPublishedInterval (normalised) Measured byLicenceHarness / effort
Cybench agents 38.0% not published Cybench leaderboard CC-BY-4.0 source
METR time horizons agents 1.4h 47.3 to 61.9 METR - Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Tasks CC-BY-4.0 / 16k source
Aider Polyglot coding 70.7% not published aider.chat CC-BY-4.0 diff source
SWE-bench Verified (Epoch's own run) coding 70.7% 66.6 to 74.7 Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 source
LMArena Text (style-controlled) preference 1414 72.8 to 74.0 LMArena CC-BY-4.0 source
ARC-AGI-2 reasoning 1.3% not published ARC Prize CC-BY-4.0 source
FrontierMath reasoning 4.1% 1.8 to 6.4 Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 / 27k source
GPQA Diamond (Epoch's own run) reasoning 69.2% 62.7 to 75.6 Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 source
Humanity's Last Exam reasoning 6.7% 4.8 to 8.6 Humanity’s Last Exam (CAIS / Scale AI) CC-BY-4.0 source
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 reasoning 60.0% 45.5 to 74.5 Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 / 16k source

Configurations rolled up: 7. Rule: median observed configuration per benchmark (lower median, always a real measurement). Harnesses seen: diff.

Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e. Grades are positional: position in the measured field, as a percentile of rank among ranked entries, n=37.