Claim · reasoning

Qwen3.7 Flashon OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

77.8 to 86.7 the range across every scoreable measurement we hold
8.9 points between the highest and the lowest
77.8 the number the board uses: the lower median, a real row with its own provenance
2 declared configurations, from 1 runner

All 2 scoreable measurements here come from ONE runner, so this is not a reconciliation and is not presented as one. What it shows is how far a single runner's number moves when the model is run differently.

Every measurement

2 rows. Best first. the board takes the LOWER MEDIAN of the scoreable measurements, which is a real row with its own interval and provenance rather than an interpolated average. a vendor self-report is shown beside the independent numbers and is never one of them; it cannot move a rank.

ScoreProvenanceConfigurationWho ran itWhere to check it
86.7 / 100
as published: 86.7%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
qwen3.7-flash Epoch AI
2026-08-07T00:02:46.000Z
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
77.8 / 100
as published: 77.8%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
qwen3.7-flash
effort none
Epoch AI
2026-08-07T00:02:33.000Z
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
← The Forge Rankings

Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e, as of 2026-08-30. where only one party has measured a model on a benchmark, this page says so rather than presenting a single number as a reconciliation.