Claim · agents

MiniMax-M3on Terminal-Bench 2

— to — the range across every scoreable measurement we hold

— points between the highest and the lowest

— the number the board uses: the lower median, a real row with its own provenance

0 declared configurations, from 0 runners

1 / 2 rows whose cited page still shows this figure, refetched and checked by us

All 0 scoreable measurements here come from one runner under one declared configuration, so nothing on this page explains why they differ. That is the finding.

1 of 2 cited pages no longer show the figure we publish. The page was refetched and split at its own structural boundaries, and no block that names this model carries this number. That does not make the measurement wrong: a leaderboard is a living page and a figure recorded when it was there can be gone by the time you follow the link. It does mean the citation, as printed, no longer supports the number, and this is the only place we know of that says so about its own sources.

Vendor numbers nobody has independently checked

Published by the model's own maker, on a variant of this benchmark that no independent party we hold has run. They are recorded and they are shown. They can never move a rank.

Variant	Claimed
89_tasks	66.0

Every measurement

2 rows. Best first. the board takes the LOWER MEDIAN of the scoreable measurements, which is a real row with its own interval and provenance rather than an interpolated average. a vendor self-report is shown beside the independent numbers and is never one of them; it cannot move a rank.

Score	Provenance	Configuration	Who ran it	Where to check it
66.0 / 100 as published: 66.0%	CLAIMED shown, never scored	MiniMax-M3 harness Terminus 2 effort not_disclosed variant 89_tasks	MiniMax via Model benchmark dossier 2026-06-01T00:00:00.000Z facts, not expression	checked: this figure is not on the page today2026-08-30MiniMax M3 minimax.io
62.1 / 100 as published: 62.1%	UNATTRIBUTED shown, never scored	MiniMax-M3 harness Ante pinned public release effort not_disclosed variant 89_tasks	Antigma via Model benchmark dossier 2026-06-23T00:00:00.000Z facts, not expression	checked: this figure appears in the page’s row for this model2026-08-3016 MiniMax M3 Ante + MiniMax M3 model · 62.1% would slot between public #16 and #17 antigma.ai

← The Forge Rankings

Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e, as of 2026-08-30. where only one party has measured a model on a benchmark, this page says so rather than presenting a single number as a reconciliation.