Claim · reasoning

Grok 4.6on ARC-AGI-2

27.6 to 67.1 the range across every scoreable measurement we hold
39.4 points between the highest and the lowest
61.3 the number the board uses: the lower median, a real row with its own provenance
4 declared configurations, from 1 runner

All 4 scoreable measurements here come from ONE runner, so this is not a reconciliation and is not presented as one. What it shows is how far a single runner's number moves when the model is run differently.

Every measurement

4 rows. Best first. the board takes the LOWER MEDIAN of the scoreable measurements, which is a real row with its own interval and provenance rather than an interpolated average. a vendor self-report is shown beside the independent numbers and is never one of them; it cannot move a rank.

ScoreProvenanceConfigurationWho ran itWhere to check it
67.1 / 100
as published: 67.1%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
grok-4.6
effort xhigh
ARC Prize
via Epoch AI
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
65.1 / 100
as published: 65.1%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
grok-4.6
effort high
ARC Prize
via Epoch AI
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
61.3 / 100
as published: 61.3%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
grok-4.6
effort medium
ARC Prize
via Epoch AI
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
27.6 / 100
as published: 27.6%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
grok-4.6
effort low
ARC Prize
via Epoch AI
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
← The Forge Rankings

Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e, as of 2026-08-30. where only one party has measured a model on a benchmark, this page says so rather than presenting a single number as a reconciliation.