All 4 scoreable measurements here come from ONE runner, so this is not a reconciliation and is not presented as one. What it shows is how far a single runner's number moves when the model is run differently.
4 rows, after collapsing 1 that were one measurement written twice. Best first. the board takes the LOWER MEDIAN of the scoreable measurements, which is a real row with its own interval and provenance rather than an interpolated average. a vendor self-report is shown beside the independent numbers and is never one of them; it cannot move a rank.
| Score | Provenance | Configuration | Who ran it | Where to check it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.0 / 100
as published: 85.0% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
gpt-5.5 effort xhigh |
ARC Prize via Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 83.3 / 100
as published: 83.3% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
gpt-5.5 effort high |
ARC Prize via Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 70.4 / 100
as published: 70.4% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
gpt-5.5 effort medium |
ARC Prize via Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 33.3 / 100
as published: 33.3% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
gpt-5.5 effort low |
ARC Prize via Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e, as of 2026-08-30. where only one party has measured a model on a benchmark, this page says so rather than presenting a single number as a reconciliation.