Claim · reasoning

GPT-5.4 Nano (2026-03-17)on OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025

46.7 to 87.8 the range across every scoreable measurement we hold
41.1 points between the highest and the lowest
68.9 the number the board uses: the lower median, a real row with its own provenance
3 declared configurations, from 1 runner

All 3 scoreable measurements here come from ONE runner, so this is not a reconciliation and is not presented as one. What it shows is how far a single runner's number moves when the model is run differently.

Every measurement

3 rows. Best first. the board takes the LOWER MEDIAN of the scoreable measurements, which is a real row with its own interval and provenance rather than an interpolated average. a vendor self-report is shown beside the independent numbers and is never one of them; it cannot move a rank.

ScoreProvenanceConfigurationWho ran itWhere to check it
87.8 / 100
as published: 87.8%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-17
effort high
Epoch AI
2026-04-14T15:08:33.525Z
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
68.9 / 100
as published: 68.9%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-17
effort low
Epoch AI
2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
46.7 / 100
as published: 46.7%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
gpt-5.4-nano-2026-03-17
effort none
Epoch AI
2026-08-07T00:01:03.000Z
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
← The Forge Rankings

Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e, as of 2026-08-30. where only one party has measured a model on a benchmark, this page says so rather than presenting a single number as a reconciliation.