Claim · coding

GPT-5.1 (2025-11-13)on SWE-bench Verified (Epoch's own run)

65.9 to 68.0 the range across every scoreable measurement we hold
2.1 points between the highest and the lowest
65.9 the number the board uses: the lower median, a real row with its own provenance
1 declared configuration, from 1 runner

All 2 scoreable measurements here come from one runner under one declared configuration, so nothing on this page explains why they differ. That is the finding.

Two measurements, one declared configuration, +2.1 points apart. 2 rows here agree on everything the record states, the system identity included, and disagree on the number: 68.0, 65.9. Something moved the score and no source we hold says what. The board resolves it by taking the lower median, which is a rule and not an explanation, so it is named here rather than quietly settled. This happens in 14 of 321 claim pages.

Every measurement

2 rows. Best first. the board takes the LOWER MEDIAN of the scoreable measurements, which is a real row with its own interval and provenance rather than an interpolated average. a vendor self-report is shown beside the independent numbers and is never one of them; it cannot move a rank.

ScoreProvenanceConfigurationWho ran itWhere to check it
68.0 / 100
as published: 68.0%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
gpt-5.1-2025-11-13
effort high
Epoch AI
2026-02-18T12:36:35.180Z
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
65.9 / 100
as published: 65.9%
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking
gpt-5.1-2025-11-13
effort high
Epoch AI
2026-02-17T01:48:11.460Z
CC-BY-4.0
NO_URL2026-08-30
benchmark leaderboard
the leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row
← The Forge Rankings

Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e, as of 2026-08-30. where only one party has measured a model on a benchmark, this page says so rather than presenting a single number as a reconciliation.