All 4 scoreable measurements here come from one runner under one declared configuration, so nothing on this page explains why they differ. That is the finding.
4 rows. Best first. the board takes the LOWER MEDIAN of the scoreable measurements, which is a real row with its own interval and provenance rather than an interpolated average. a vendor self-report is shown beside the independent numbers and is never one of them; it cannot move a rank.
| Score | Provenance | Configuration | Who ran it | Where to check it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69.2 / 100
as published: 69.2% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
effort 120k | ARC Prize via Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 68.8 / 100
as published: 68.8% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
effort 120k | ARC Prize via Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 66.3 / 100
as published: 66.3% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
effort 120k | ARC Prize via Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 64.6 / 100
as published: 64.6% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
effort 120k | ARC Prize via Epoch AI CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e, as of 2026-08-30. where only one party has measured a model on a benchmark, this page says so rather than presenting a single number as a reconciliation.