All 2 scoreable measurements here come from ONE runner, so this is not a reconciliation and is not presented as one. What it shows is how far a single runner's number moves when the model is run differently.
Matched on which variant of the benchmark was sat, and on nothing else: the vendor ran it on their harness and the independent party on theirs, and that difference is the comparison rather than an obstacle to it. A vendor number with no independent run of the same variant carries no delta, because a number that cannot be compared honestly must not be compared.
| Variant | Vendor claims | Independently measured | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| as published, no variant stated | 63.1 | 59.1 from 2 runs | +4.0 |
10 rows. Best first. the board takes the LOWER MEDIAN of the scoreable measurements, which is a real row with its own interval and provenance rather than an interpolated average. a vendor self-report is shown beside the independent numbers and is never one of them; it cannot move a rank.
| Score | Provenance | Configuration | Who ran it | Where to check it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63.1 / 100
as published: 63.1% |
UNATTRIBUTED
shown, never scored |
harness Droid | Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI 2025-12-11 CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 63.1 / 100
as published: 63.1% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
harness Droid | Terminal-Bench v2 Leaderboard via Epoch AI 2025-12-11 CC-BY-4.0 |
checked: this figure is not on the page today2026-08-30 Terminal-Bench v2 Leaderboard |
| 59.1 / 100
as published: 59.1% |
UNATTRIBUTED
shown, never scored |
harness Letta Code | Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI 2025-12-17 CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 59.1 / 100
as published: 59.1% |
INDEPENDENT
counts toward the ranking |
harness Letta Code effort 128k |
Terminal-Bench v2 Leaderboard via Epoch AI 2025-12-17 CC-BY-4.0 |
checked: this figure is not on the page today2026-08-30 Terminal-Bench v2 Leaderboard |
| 58.4 / 100
as published: 58.4% |
UNATTRIBUTED
shown, never scored |
harness Mux | Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI 2026-01-17 CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 57.8 / 100
as published: 57.8% |
UNATTRIBUTED
shown, never scored |
harness Terminus 2 | Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI 2025-11-22 CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 54.3 / 100
as published: 54.3% |
UNATTRIBUTED
shown, never scored |
harness Goose | Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI 2025-12-11 CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 52.1 / 100
as published: 52.1% |
UNATTRIBUTED
shown, never scored |
harness Claude Code | Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI 2025-12-18 CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 51.9 / 100
as published: 51.9% |
UNATTRIBUTED
shown, never scored |
harness OpenHands | Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI 2026-01-04 CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
| 51.7 / 100
as published: 51.7% |
UNATTRIBUTED
shown, never scored |
harness OpenCode | Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI 2026-01-12 CC-BY-4.0 |
NO_URL2026-08-30 benchmark leaderboardthe leaderboard for this benchmark, not a link to this row |
Snapshot 2026-08-30-62e4e85f043b, manifest dc46131315046f1e, as of 2026-08-30. where only one party has measured a model on a benchmark, this page says so rather than presenting a single number as a reconciliation.